Comments on: DigitalOcean Premium vs Vultr High Frequency Performance https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/ Thu, 05 May 2022 13:24:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: Faizan https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-40 Thu, 05 May 2022 13:24:10 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-40 Thanks for the article.

If I have to select between Vultr high
frequency and high performance for a very dynamic website(buddyboss),
which one would you choose? And why? I asked support the difference and
here’s their replyhttps://d.pr/i/THULON.

]]>
By: Jacek Stypuła https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-39 Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:42:05 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-39 Very nice benchmark. Thanks a lot!

Vultr’s just added High-Performance VMs (3rd Generation AMD EPYC CPUs). I’d love you to do the comparison with these.

]]>
By: Jon Phillips https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-69 Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:53:33 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-69 Gijo, I recently posted this comment in The Admin Bar Facebook Group and you might be able to answer this yourself:

“Has anyone done their own performance comparisons between similarly provisioned UpCloud servers vs. Vultr HF vs. Digital Ocean’s Premium AMD Droplets?

I know Vultr HF boxes are all the rage as of late, but I’m super intrigued by UpCloud’s offerings. And DO’s AMD Droplets also look promising. I’m planning on running my own batch of tests.

But if anyone else has done a shootout comparing something like a clone of a brochure/eCommerce/LMS website across those different hosting environments, I’m interested in your findings if you care to share.

I have an LMS site on a Premium DO droplet right now. And it slaps. But I’m going to clone it over to those other setups with similar resource provisions to see what performs best in a few different server load tests using Loader.io
https://loader.io/

Gijo at WP Speed Matters has a great tutorial on how to use Loader to simulate all kinds of traffic surges for testing purposes if anyone is interested in testing their own stuff.

Just don’t get yourself in trouble with your hosting provider’s billing if you cause yourself some overages when testing a bunch of stuff with this method. Hopefully hosts can filter out the bit traffic and note it’s not legitimate, human visits to your site. Fair warning though.”

With all ^that said, have you done any testing on similarly provisioned servers from UpCloud vs. Vultr HF vs. DO Premium AMD droplet?

I’ve recently started using GridPane and I’m planning on spinning up a few servers on the providers mentioned above. I’ll run the same kind of test like you described in your post here. Are there any other kinds of tests you recommend when using Loader.io?

Just curious if you’ve done any tests comparing these 3 specific providers anytime recently. Obviously, you’ve already compared Vultr HF to DO Premium AMD droplet. But I’m curious if there’d be any difference if the same batch of tests was run again with UpCloud in the mix for comparison.

When I run my tests, I’ll link my results here for anyone interested.

]]>
By: Jack V Johnson https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-84 Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:58:12 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-84 @gijovarghese:disqus – Did you make any changes to the test settings in the Advanced section? I ask because I did the same test on one of my sites on WebhostPython, but it showed sent 450 KB and received 646 MB… The account has 6 GB RAM, but would that account for the difference between 37 MB (Vultr HF in your tests) and 646 MB?

]]>
By: Grant Mucha https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-78 Sat, 19 Jun 2021 20:36:42 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-78 Testing $5 VPS instances for performance is comical. Test for real world not development applications. What’s next Pi 4?

]]>
By: Gijo Varghese https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-128 Thu, 27 May 2021 02:17:27 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-128 In reply to Cipriаn Groot.

Yes, will do more tests

]]>
By: Luk https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-123 Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:06:14 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-123 In this test i see that you use NGINX. In previous tests you usually recommend Litespeed as the fastest one.

NGINX is the best option at this time?

Thanks!

]]>
By: giuspe https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-63 Mon, 15 Mar 2021 06:52:29 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-63 my quick 2c.
I did pretty much the same comparison recently: Vultr HF, DO and Linode, for a 4GB machine with the same heavy-sh woocommerce website (managed from a Cloudways account).

I’d have to find the numbers somewhere :), but we ended up going with Vultr as well: performances were very somolar to DO’s, but some values ended up being a little better on Vultr.

(From memory, the only test DO was substantially better was one of the SSD read tests, cannot remember if sequential or random)

(Linode didn’t even made the podium: performances were substantially worse)

]]>
By: Cipriаn Groot https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-115 Sun, 14 Mar 2021 14:04:35 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-115 Wish you would test more, like Upcloud and Hetzner.

]]>
By: mj https://wpspeedmatters.com/digitalocean-premium-vs-vultr-high-frequency/#comment-75 Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:51:18 +0000 https://wpspeedmatters.com/?p=3922#comment-75 And now it’s vultr’s turn, they are simply ahead. DO will probably stay behind for a longer time

]]>